On Mar 22, 2:04 pm, Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> wrote: > actually, sage: standard_packages() > says that the following standard spkg's are not installed in a t2 > build of sage-4.3.4 I made. > > ['cddlib-094f.p5', 'flintqs-20070817.p4', 'gfan-0.4plus', > 'moin-1.9.1.p1', 'palp-1.1.p1', 'pil-1.1.6.p2', > 'polytopes_db-20100210', 'sagetex-2.2.3.p0', 'scipy-0.7.p4', > 'scipy_sandbox-20071020.p4', 'sqlalchemy-0.5.8', > 'tachyon-0.98beta.p10', 'weave-0.4.9.p0'] > > Is this normal?
I built Sage 4.3.4 on a Sun Blade 1000, and found all the standard packages were built. drkir...@redstart:~/sage-4.3.4$ ./sage ---------------------------------------------------------------------- | Sage Version 4.3.4, Release Date: 2010-03-19 | | Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information. | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- sage: standard_packages() (['atlas-3.8.3.p12', 'blas-20070724', 'boehm_gc-7.1.p4', 'boost- cropped-1.34.1', 'cddlib-094f.p5', 'cliquer-1.2.p5', 'conway_polynomials-0.2', 'cvxopt-0.9.p8', 'cython-0.12.1', 'docutils-0.5.p0', 'ecl-10.2.1', 'eclib-20080310.p10', 'ecm-6.2.1.p2', 'elliptic_curves-0.1', 'examples-4.3.4', 'extcode-4.3.4', 'f2c-20070816.p2', 'flint-1.5.0.p4', 'flintqs-20070817.p4', 'fortran-20100118', 'freetype-2.3.5.p2', 'gap-4.4.12.p1', 'gd-2.0.35.p4', 'gdmodule-0.56.p6', 'genus2reduction-0.3.p6', 'gfan-0.4plus', 'ghmm-20080813.p0', 'givaro-3.2.13rc2.p0', 'gnutls-2.2.1.p5', 'graphs-20070722.p1', 'gsl-1.10.p2', 'iconv-1.13.1', 'iml-1.0.1.p12', 'ipython-0.9.1.p0', 'jinja-1.2.p0', 'jinja2-2.1.1.p0', 'lapack-20071123.p1', 'lcalc-20080205.p4', 'libfplll-3.0.12.p0', 'libgcrypt-1.4.4.p2', 'libgpg_error-1.6.p3', 'libm4ri-20091120.p0', 'libpng-1.2.35.p0', 'linbox-1.1.6.p3', 'matplotlib-0.99.1.p4', 'maxima-5.20.1', 'mercurial-1.3.1.p1', 'moin-1.9.1.p1', 'mpfi-1.3.4-cvs20071125.p8', 'mpfr-2.4.2', 'mpir-1.2.2.p0', 'mpmath-0.14', 'networkx-0.99.p1- fake_really-0.36.p1', 'ntl-5.4.2.p11', 'numpy-1.3.0.p2', 'opencdk-0.6.6.p3', 'palp-1.1.p1', 'pari-2.3.3.p8', 'pexpect-2.0.p4', 'pil-1.1.6.p2', 'polybori-0.6.3-20091028', 'polytopes_db-20100210', 'pycrypto-2.0.1.p5', 'pygments-0.11.1.p0', 'pynac-0.1.11', 'python-2.6.4.p7', 'python_gnutls-1.1.4.p7', 'r-2.10.1.p0', 'ratpoints-2.1.3.p0', 'readline-6.0.p1', 'rubiks-20070912.p10', 'sage-4.3.4', 'sage_scripts-4.3.4', 'sagenb-0.7.5.3', 'sagetex-2.2.3.p0', 'scipy-0.7.p4', 'scipy_sandbox-20071020.p4', 'scons-1.2.0', 'setuptools-0.6c9.p0', 'singular-3-1-0-4-20100214', 'sphinx-0.6.3.p4', 'sqlalchemy-0.5.8', 'sqlite-3.6.22', 'symmetrica-2.0.p5', 'sympow-1.018.1.p6', 'sympy-0.6.4.p0', 'tachyon-0.98beta.p10', 'termcap-1.3.1.p1', 'twisted-9.0.p2', 'weave-0.4.9.p0', 'zlib-1.2.3.p5', 'zn_poly-0.9.p3', 'zodb3-3.7.0.p3'], []) sage: Note the second list is empty. I've not run the doctests yet - will start that in a few minutes or ro. I've no idea why the build on 't2' was not so successful. I'll create a binary from this and upload that to 't2'. I'm still puzzled how an earlier build of mine can have 4 uninstalled standard packages, yet still pass all the doctests. It makes no sence to me. (See my other post on that subject, to which there are no replies). Dave -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
