On 20 March 2010 17:01, Rishikesh <rishi...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have problem with #1 and #4 > > with #1 > spkgs are almost always not created by the authors of the package. > Compiler warnings happen in compiling almost every package. It will > be too much expect that people creating spkg eliminate compiler > warnings, even though the package compiles.
I was not saying they should elimiminate compiler warnings. In fact, no mention was made of a compiler. Neither did I use the word eliminate. What I object to is when people update .spkg files, and ignore the fact configure scripts say options are unreconised. I dont't think it unreasonable people look at any warnings and ensure things are no worst than they were, which is what is happening. > > with #4 > I agree with John Palmieri. I revised #4. Were the revisions OK ? Dave -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
