Nick,
well, I found this particular figure of speech ("the people...") quite
disturbing;
perhaps cause it reminded me of Soviet Union, where I grew up, or
perhaps because it is (over)used by American politicians...
It just could be that Dave snapped for a similar reason (although I
cannot read his mind).

I would be perfectly fine with "in my capacity of moderator of sage-
devel" (which would be more to the point, anyway),
or something like this.

OK, enough of this mix of linguistics and politics :)
Dima

On Mar 18, 1:56 pm, Nick Alexander <ncalexan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 17-Mar-10, at 10:41 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> > William,
> > While  I think that posts here on a particular part of functionality
> > (e.g. Solaris port) *continuing to work after an
> > update* should not happen here, only posts on  particular parts of
> > functionality *ceasing to work* should be welcome (Dave, please take
> > the note),
> > (while such posts would still be appropriate on a list that
> > specifically concerns the  particular part of functionality (e.g.  
> > sage-
> > solaris)),
> > since when do you talk for "the people on sage-devel"?
>
> Since more or less the beginning of the project.  We have a long  
> history of having William speak for the collective; I'm not saying  
> this is a perfect arrangement, but we have functioned this way for a  
> long time, and it has been reasonably successful.  (In this case, I  
> was privy to some of the discussion, being part of JSAGE, the slightly  
> more formal Sage board.)
>
> > Please take down that date - the date of the beginning of the demise
> > of Sage project, as we know it... :-)
> > No, seriously - OK, you are moderating sage-devel; you are concerned
> > about too much traffic
> > going on here on a particular issue. But this does not mean you need
> > to act and sound  dictatorially, at least not
> > in this particular case.
> > Whereas, IMHO, creation of sage-solaris and in particular the tone of
> > the ensuing discussion here falls under the latter pattern.
>
> I disagree -- but then again, I was one of the earliest to complain  
> about what I perceive to be a waste of my sage-devel bandwidth, so  
> maybe we were bound to disagree :)
>
> Nick

-- 
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to