Congratulations, it seems that you have made a great deal of progress on this!
-Marshall On Mar 1, 8:42 am, "Dr. David Kirkby" <david.kir...@onetel.net> wrote: > I've just succeeded in getting all doctests to pass on Solaris. After updating > sqlite, which awaits review at: > > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8408 > > as well as the following (some need review) > > * #7867 Python patch, to allow Sage library to build. > * #8191 Addition of iconv, which is needed for R > * #8285 Update R's spkg-install to work on Solaris > * #8363 Remove a useless check for mpir in cddlib > * #8375 Numerical noise in devel/sage/sage/symbolic/pynac.pyx > * #8374 Numerical noise in devel/sage/sage/symbolic/constants_c.pyx > * #8371 Patch to allow pyprocessing to build - it failed after python was > patched as #7867. (Note #6503 aims to remove pyprocessing completely). > > ALL the Solaris doctests pass on my Blade 1000!!! > > Prior to updating sqlite, 5 tests were failing, but the sqlite update sorted > them all out. > > The longest test is taking about 460 s on my 10-year old machine, but I rekon > on > 't2' one would have to set SAGE_TIMEOUT to 2000 s to be safe, as 't2', which > is > designed for very different tasks, is significantly slower than my machine. > > I suspect someone will manage to break something in the next release, but if > the > release is handled carefully, it should be possible to produce a Sage which > not > only builds on Solaris, but passed all doctests too. > > I have not yet run the long doctests. (Perhaps I'm frightened too!) > > Dave -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
