On 20 February 2010 18:26, Minh Nguyen <nguyenmi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Robert, > > On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 5:18 AM, ma...@mendelu.cz <ma...@mendelu.cz> wrote: > > <SNIP> > >> This solves the problem with dostests, but I see another problem: we >> have two different answers. One of them is wrong. Which one? And why? >> >> And is it O.K. to change doctest instead of fix a bug? > > The function call h.n() results in a numerical appoximation, which is > I think machine dependent. One gets different answers on different > machines, as the doctest reports on the 32-bit Suse and 64-bit Itanium > machines show. So I think it's not even a 32- vs. 64-bit issue. So I > think it's architecture dependent.
Would it be more arch. independent if we used RR(h) instead? John > > -- > Regards > Minh Van Nguyen > > -- > To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to > sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel > URL: http://www.sagemath.org > -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
