On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 07:50:57AM -0800, javier wrote:
> Apparently I was assuming too much. The result of the evaluation of
> the character belongs to some cyclotomic field, so apparently the
> problem is that there is not a coercion between cyclotomic fields and
> QQbar. I can circumvent the problem by using CC rather than QQbar, but
> I'd rather have exact coefficients.
What do you mean by exact? I am using CyclotomicFields on a regular
basis for similar things, and this works well. And I would expect it
to be faster than QQbar.
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil" <nthi...@users.sf.net>
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
