On 02/09/2010 07:32 PM, kcrisman wrote:
Ah, that is very helpful. In this case the numerical approximations do indeed agree up to the output of n(). Perhaps we could potentially go back to keepfloat:false but with whatever the standard precision in Sage would equate to - Jason, would that help things with matrices?
I don't remember. From #2400, it seems that would obsolete the work-around we had to do at that time to keep matrix exponentials happy. So I guess people won't see any difference with matrices (i.e., keepfloat will still be false), and the code will be slightly cleaner.
Thanks, Jason -- Jason Grout -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
