On 2010-Feb-08 22:16:52 +0000, "Dr. David Kirkby" <david.kir...@onetel.net> wrote: >Georg S. Weber wrote: >> >> "... either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later >> version ..." > >Someone reviewed something I wrote for Sage, which I'd marked as GPL 2. They >wanted added "or (at your option) any later version".
To take a different tack, it's your code, you can place any license on it that you want. You can choose to take the GPL (or part thereof) or you could equally validly use the Microsoft Windows EULA. If you are writing code with the intention of embedding it into a larger body of code (eg Sage) then you license needs to be compatible with the overall license. Since the overall Sage license is GPL2+ then making your code GPL2+ maximises the compatibility. Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice. -- Peter Jeremy
pgp3ak6pBnahM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
