On 2010-Feb-02 11:37:35 +0000, "Dr. David Kirkby" <david.kir...@onetel.net> wrote: >I do not consider using crle a viable option, though it would work.
The problem with crle is that it's system-wide, as you point out. >I'll look at using the dumpspecs on 't2'. It's not clear to me where I would >edit that though. The format of the file is not very obvious, and when I >searched a few weeks ago for documentation on this file, there is very little. The only documentaion I can find is "info gcc inv spec". This states that there's a builtin default which can be overridden on the command line. This makes it less use than I thought (I was under the impression that it loaded the specs from near the cc1/cc1obj/cc1plus executables). I agree that the format is somewhat opaque. -- Peter Jeremy
pgpaNuCSkS42y.pgp
Description: PGP signature
