On #7325, we are getting hardware or software-dependent results, which are easy to deal with as the results are equivalent, but which raises the question of how to correctly use of Python's set().
On sage.math: sage: set((x,y)) set([y, x]) On my Macintel 10.5: sage: set((x,y)) set([x, y]) Then when one makes an iterator, it becomes dependent on this. set() is a pure Python thing, I believe. Can anyone shed light on this - to be precise, how to avoid this dependence in making an iterator without (say) sorting? Has this ever caused problems in Sage before? Thanks for any insight on this Python question! - kcrisman -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
