Patches up for a basic sparse fp matrix, #7723. That's the very basics, and if accepted I can move on to the fancier stuff -- I prefer getting corrections of course early...
William Stein wrote: > I really hope that the Sage matrix design is sufficiently flexible > that it can be adapted to work for your purposes. I put a lot of time > into designing the overall structure so it would at least work for > what I wanted. > I hope so too. So far my experience is that I like how things are designed and what it can do for my own code (basically make it a lot cleaner), but there's *a lot* of holes to fill in to make it useful even in a basic sense for numerics (also for dense matrices for instance). I've seen that there's some more work than I first imagined to make it usable for me, but I'm not sure if there are other alternatives (besides my own code base being a mess -- which I might go for in the end..). I will simply have to start using it and see whether I find it easier to drop this or keep evolving it. If the latter, I'd have to supply some patches for dense fp matrices too. Dag Sverre -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
