Hi folks,

The SciPy 2009 proceedings [1] contain four papers that cite Sage. These are:

(1) Stefan Behnel, Robert W. Bradshaw, and Dag Sverre Seljebotn.
Cython Tutorial. In Gaël Varoquaux, Stéfan van der Walt, and K. Jarrod
Millman (ed.). SciPy 2009: Proceedings of the 8th Python in Science
Conference. pages 4--14, 2009.

(2) Brian D'Urso. Multiprocess System for Virtual Instruments in
Python. In Gaël Varoquaux, Stéfan van der Walt, and K. Jarrod Millman
(ed.). SciPy 2009: Proceedings of the 8th Python in Science
Conference. pages 76--80, 2009.

(3) Dag Sverre Seljebotn. Fast Numerical Computations with Cython. In
Gaël Varoquaux, Stéfan van der Walt, and K. Jarrod Millman (ed.).
SciPy 2009: Proceedings of the 8th Python in Science Conference. pages
15--22, 2009.

(4) Pavel Solin, Ondrej Certik, and Sameer Regmi. The FEMhub Project
and Classroom Teaching of Numerical Methods. In Gaël Varoquaux, Stéfan
van der Walt, and K. Jarrod Millman (ed.). SciPy 2009: Proceedings of
the 8th Python in Science Conference. pages 58--61, 2009.

The publications page [2] has been updated accordingly.


[1] http://conference.scipy.org/proceedings/SciPy2009/

[2] http://www.sagemath.org/library-publications.html

-- 
Regards
Minh Van Nguyen


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Dag Sverre Seljebotn <da...@student.matnat.uio.no>
Date: Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 9:02 PM
Subject: [cython-users] Scipy09 Proceedings
To: cython-us...@googlegroups.com


The SciPy 09 proceedings are out, with the final versions of two
papers on Cython, "Cython Tutorial" and "Fast numerical computations
with Cython". See

http://conference.scipy.org/proceedings/SciPy2009/

(near the top). If Cython plays an important and direct role in
getting your scientific computations done, please consider citing the
relevant papers.

NOTE if you read the preprint of the numerical computation paper: I
claimed in the preprint (but not the talk, luckily) that Cython was 50
times faster than NumPy, but that was a bug, it was only 10 times
faster.

Cython developers might also be interested in the Convert-XY paper on
that page for an alternative approach for Python<->C++ object
conversion. If we decide to, say, auto-convert a Python dict to a
std::map, then this is likely what we should go for. (However such
conversion, where a copy is made, doesn't play well with
pass-by-reference, so I'm not sure whether that should happen).

Dag Sverre

-- 
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to