On 26-Nov-09, at 10:18 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: > On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 08:30:53AM -0800, YannLC wrote: >> Just a toy implementation as a very thin layer over dict (at least it >> should be fast) > > That's precisely what CombinatorialFreeModule elements are :-) > > Further optimizations to it are most welcome (For example, I am not > sure += is implemented there)! > > Yes, the name is bad: there is nothing combinatorial to it. Merging > this into FreeModule so that one could do FreeModule(QQ, Objects()) is > part of the future plan.
I have been an observer of the sage-combinat process since its inception and, I must say, I have been mildly skeptical (very mildly). But if you guys allow me to view a multivariate polynomial ring as a module over its base ring I will be very grateful. Nick -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
