Hi Florent! PS:
On Nov 26, 9:24 am, Florent Hivert <florent.hiv...@univ-rouen.fr> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 01:16:09AM -0800, Simon King wrote: > > > On Nov 26, 2009, at 12:35 AM, Florent Hivert wrote: > > [...] > > > I think this makes perfect sense...I'm actually surprised it's not > > > implemented that way already. > > > That's impossible. I understood "I'm surprised it's not implemented that way" as follows: "Why don't you always chose an underlying polynomial ring that is big enough, as in the example of summation?" And this is, as I had pointed out, impossible. Cheers, Simon -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
