On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 9:26 AM, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Aleksej Saushev <a...@inbox.ru> wrote:
>> William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> 2009/11/15 Serge A. Salamanka <salsa-...@tut.by>:
>>>>
>>>> I can see no dots in Russia also.
>>>> I guess that the problem of free mathematical software doesn't exist in
>>>> our scientific world - Mathematica is actually free and it will stay
>>>> until the time Mathematica supports russian language in the program
>>>> interface and documentation.
>>>
>>> Do Russians care about open source -- e.g., one can change Sage much
>>> more than one can change Mathematica.  Also, Sage has vastly more
>>> capabilities in number theory and algebraic combinatorics than
>>> Mathematica, but this will only matter to specialists.
>>
>> Yes, we care about open source.
>>
>> I have report from one person that Sage is useless because it doesn't
>> provide anything more than its constituent parts.
>
> What does that even mean?  Is it some subtle expression that I'm
> missing?   In English we have the expression "The whole is greater
> than the sum of its parts".
>
> Taken at face value in the context of Sage, the above statement is
> completely false, and could only be made by somebody who has never
> used Sage for more than a second.   I could definitely see somebody
> making the above statements about Python(x,y) or Enthought's Python
> Distribution.

I just realized that Mike is right.  There exist certain areas of
mathematics where Sage doesn't provide anything extra beyond its
constituent parts.  E.g., a statement like "For computations in 7
dimensional quasi-numerical stable algebras,  Sage is useless for me
because it doesn't provide anything more than its constituent parts."

William

-- 
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to