On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 01:55:29PM -0800, William Stein wrote: > > I strongly agree with this. In fact, last week when I was hanging out > with Jarrod Millman (of scipy/numpy), he baited me -- "so, are you > guys using Sphinx a lot for Sage yet?" When I said "yes!", he > responded, "so how did you guys solve the references problem, since > references are a total mess in Sphinx?" And said that we hadn't yet. > Of course, it was inevitable that we would run head first into this > problem eventually, and it's amusing that we did this week. > > Anyway, I agree with Robert -- to solve this particular problem we > will have to go creatively beyond what Sphinx offers "out of the box". >
Since we're not the only ones having this sort of problem, I wonder if we can convince the Sphinx developers to do something about it. We would probably have a better chance of doing this if we had a good idea of how we would like references to work in an ideal world. (A quick look at Sphinx' trac didn't yield any relevant tickets. I'll try to have a look at their mailing list as well to see if anything was brought up.) Best, Alex -- Alex Ghitza -- Lecturer in Mathematics -- The University of Melbourne -- Australia -- http://www.ms.unimelb.edu.au/~aghitza/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
