On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 4:15 PM, mhampton <hampto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I get:
>
> abort: There is no Mercurial repository here (.hg not found)!
>
> once I am in spkg/build/sagenb-0.3.3 and I try to import the patch.

Sorry, you should go into

     spkg/build/sagenb-0.3.3/src/

William



> -Marshall
>
> On Oct 20, 5:48 pm, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 3:44 PM, mhampton <hampto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > I'm having trouble applying the patch, is it based on sage-4.1.2?
>>
>> It's a patch to the *notebook*, not to Sage.  To referee,  install the 
>> notebook:
>>
>> sage -f 
>> -mhttp://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wstein/patches/sagenb/sagenb-0.3...
>>
>> then
>>
>> cd spkg/build/sagenb-0.3.3
>> hg import <name of patch>
>> sage -python setup.py install
>>
>> and try it out.
>>
>> William
>>
>>
>>
>> > I'll leave further comments on trac.
>>
>> > -Marshall
>>
>> > On Oct 20, 5:38 pm, mhampton <hampto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> I can review this, doing it now.
>>
>> >> -Marshall
>>
>> >> On Oct 20, 5:12 pm, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> > Hi,
>>
>> >> > There is now a patch up to fix the reset() bug.
>> >> > Seehttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7255.
>>
>> >> > Somebody please review it!
>>
>> >> > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 2:26 PM, lutusp <lut...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> > > On Oct 20, 1:22 pm, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> > > // ...
>>
>> >> > >> Weird.  There are changes in the new notebook that could impact
>> >> > >> performance in surprising ways.  E.g., after a computation is
>> >> > >> completed that creates output files, those files are moved back into
>> >> > >> the server's directory.  This is much more flexible and *secure* (for
>> >> > >> public servers) than the previous setup, but could result in reduced
>> >> > >> performance.
>>
>> >> > >> Could you post the specific interact that slows down 
>> >> > >> tohttp://wiki.sagemath.org/interactsomewhere, so others can try?
>>
>> >> > > I have uploaded the @interact worksheet here:
>>
>> >> > >http://arachnoid.com/temp/polynomial_regression.sws
>>
>> >> > > The cell of interest is the one marked "# interactive version".
>> >> > > Compare execution times on this cell to the next cell down: "# static
>> >> > > version" The static version can meaningfully have the "time%" label
>> >> > > applied to compare times, but I don't know how to compare times on a
>> >> > > run-by-run basis in an @interact cell.
>>
>> >> > > This worksheet is a good test base for time comparisons, because it
>> >> > > needs to do some heavy lifting to create its graphic, e.g. a matrix
>> >> > > population and Gauss-Jordan elimination between displayed results.
>>
>> >> > --
>> >> > William Stein
>> >> > Associate Professor of Mathematics
>> >> > University of Washingtonhttp://wstein.org
>>
>> --
>> William Stein
>> Associate Professor of Mathematics
>> University of Washingtonhttp://wstein.org
> >
>



-- 
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to