On Oct 20, 10:22 am, "ma...@mendelu.cz" <ma...@mendelu.cz> wrote:
> On 17 říj, 21:17, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Hm, probably this is the only available way how to solve inequalities
> > > and at least the wrapper should be written.
> > > I can try it, but not within these 14 days.
>
> > Wow, that's awesome. You should definitely try two weeks from now!!
>
> Despite my previous posts, I am working on this, hope to finish within
> two weeks :)
>
> * I foud a bug (and a solution how to fix) in solve_rat_ineq -- I will
> report it in Maxima forum as soon as possible
Great! Don't forget to try fourier_elim as a "backup" case, or at
least as a keyword for those who want to try a little harder, similar
to the to_poly_solve keyword introduced on ticket # 6642.
> * the maxima expression x#0 (x is not equal 0) has no meaning in
> Sage. If the answer from Maxima contains x#0 and this answer is in
> variable sol, then
> sage: sol.sage()
> fails. I have no idea how and where could fix it. Can somebody add
> this feature to Sage? Thanks.
This is already fixed on Trac # 1163, waiting for review - I hope this
does what you need. In fact, if you could review that, # 385, and #
3914, I think they are all related to things you are working on, so
that would be very helpful.
- kcrisman
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
