> Should we be holding up 4.1.2 for issues that (according to what you > say) don't have any solution, when the issue in question is supporting a > new platform (at least, a new release) that admittedly breaks lots of > software out there? Or should we release 4.1.2, declare OSX 10.6 not > supported for this release, and then follow up with 4.2 when we have > fixes for 10.6?
This is a good question. > There's an awful lot already in 4.1.2, and a lot more patches are being > held up which can't be merged because 4.1.2 is frozen for who knows how > long. There are 55 "positive review" patches right now. And to be honest, there is a lot of new functionality, upgrades - 4.2 might not be an inappropriate designation for Snow Leopard support + a few other goals of various sorts. - kcrisman --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
