Dear sage-devel, We have some inconsistency in solve.
sage: solve(x^5+x^3+17*x+1,x) [x == -0.0588115172555, x == (-1.33109991788 + 1.52241655184*I), x == (-1.33109991788 - 1.52241655184*I), x == (1.36050567904 + 1.5188087221*I), x == (1.36050567904 - 1.5188087221*I)] sage: from sage.symbolic.expression import Expression sage: Expression.solve? Docstring: Analytically solve the equation ``self == 0`` for the variable `x`. .. warning:: This is not a numerical solver - use ``find_root`` to solve for self == 0 numerically on an interval. Note that sage: maxima.solve(x^5+x^3+17*x+1,x) [0=x^5+x^3+17*x+1] The reason for this is that sometime earlier this year, we added the topoly_solver package in Maxima to our solve routines to address. See the discussion at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/browse_thread/thread/6de90b91d7cf0f75/70b437ea856ff030?#70b437ea856ff030. I cannot find the ticket where this was added, though a few days ago I could. Anyway, the reason for this is that the solve routine for multiple equations in Maxima (which to_poly_solve uses) allows non-exact answers as output. This is documented (see algsys). In fact, trying to solve the equation above and y==1 simultaneously will yield the float answers. What is the desired behavior of solve()? Since roots() uses it for symbolic input, we already have some problems (also note that to_poly_solve does not return multiplicities). However, getting rid of to_poly_solve seems unpleasant too, since it does solve a lot of equations which formerly were mysterious to Sage. If you have an opinion, please let me know. Unfortunately, it doesn't look easy to keep an exact-solution-only behavior here. The author of to_poly_solve expects to fix some bugs later this fall, but probably not this aspect, since it's not a bug in Maxima, rather in our use of Maxima. - kcrisman --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---