On Sep 8, 8:54 pm, Fernando Perez <fperez....@gmail.com> wrote: > Certainly! What I'd love to have is reST as a native storage format > (so it can be easily edited outside the GUI with emacs) along with a > choice of visual/native editing in the notebook interface. It's just > that in switching from visual to native you'd go to reST as the 'raw' > format instead of pure html, and the html would be only rendered for > visual display.
What place would snippets of jsMath have in this arrangement? In other words, would jsMath still be used to interpret things like output from show(), or the "typeset" box, or would math be written as reST, such as `x^2+y^2` to be converted to images by a full-blown TeX implementation? The question could illustrate that I'm not sure I fully understand what is being suggested. Generally, I am very interested in the ability to put complex jsMath (output from the tex4ht translator) into the space between cells and have it rendered nicely in a browser. The HTML output of mathematics created by Sphinx is inline PNG's which I think of as vastly inferior to what jsMath can do. Rob --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
