On Mon, 7 Sep 2009 11:28:59 -0700
William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> >> If we also instantiate the class but with name returning 'ln', that
> >> might work.
> >
> > Whenever it made a round trip to maxima, etc. it would get
> > "normalized" back to log. Also, would
> >
> > sage: log(x) + ln(x)
> > 2*log(x)
> >
> > Just declaring ln = log, and not having ln in the output (unless
> > perhaps some special typesetting option was on) seems like the
> > simplest case to me. Having ln preserved sometimes, but not all the
> > time, is just asking for a complicated system and user confusion.

I agree.

> That's definitely the easiest to implement, since that's what we
> already have! :-)
> Well, except for this bug:
> 
> sage: log(x)
> log(x)
> sage: latex(log(x))
> \ln\left(x\right)
> 
> which of course started this whole thread.

This is easy to fix. It will be in the next pynac release, which should
be in the next Sage release. :)

This is now:

http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6902


Do we have a planned release date so I know when to wrap up my changes
in pynac and submit them for review? Minh?


Cheers,
Burcin

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to