On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Ondrej Certik<ond...@certik.cz> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 8:57 PM, William Stein<wst...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 8:53 PM, Ondrej Certik<ond...@certik.cz> wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Robert >>> Bradshaw<rober...@math.washington.edu> wrote: >>>> >>>> An interface to clawpack would go a long ways here. >>> >>> Is clawpack opensource? According to this: >>> >>> http://www.amath.washington.edu/~claw/copyright.html >>> >>> it isn't. But I know that Chris Swierczewski wants to create a Sage >>> package for it, so that'd be awesome. We'd include it in FEMhub >>> (assuming it will get opensourced). >>> >>> Ondrej >> >> Last I checked Clawpack was not open source (in the sense of an OSI >> approved license), and there were no plans to change that ever. > > I see. Well, at scipy09, my understanding was that Chris and Randy > wanted to interface it with Sage -- and we also wanted to interface it > in FEMhub, so that we can easily compare with our solvers. If Clawpack > is not opensource, we can still do it, but it will be an optional > package, e.g. I will not include it in FEMhub by default, but it will > be very easy to install. >
Yes, that's exactly what I think will happen, and I think it is fine, since Clawpack is well supported. William --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
