Hi Sebastian, On 22 Aug., 23:46, Sebastian Pancratz <s...@pancratz.org> wrote: [...] > I think I'd prefer the other suggestion, namely leaving the default > behaviour of methods like "is_field" as it is at the moment (thereby > not breaking any other code!) and introducing an optional argument to > specifically suit the typical use case.
... and also with the possibility to assert properties such as being field, being commutative, being integrally closed? Thank you for working on it! Best regards, Simon --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
