On Tuesday 04 August 2009, Nick Alexander wrote: > On 4-Aug-09, at 7:44 AM, Michael Brickenstein wrote: > > Maintaining these lookup tables and other tricks is a lot of work, > > which could be invested elsewhere, e.g. your PHD. > > Even for me, the difference between these orderings is pure subtility > > from a users perspective. > > I disagree. When you want a particular order, it's really useful to > have it implemented (and bug tested, I guess). I use 'lex' and > 'invlex' all the time; doing without one or the other would be > inconvenient, and rewriting all that code would not be 'subtle'.
The problem is that degrevlex was never properly implemented and tested, we just got away with it for some time. PolyBoRi does not support 'degrevlex' natively because it doesn't mix well with the data structure. If it is required we keep supporting degrevlex we should at least throw a warning about it. Martin -- name: Martin Albrecht _pgp: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8EF0DC99 _otr: 47F43D1A 5D68C36F 468BAEBA 640E8856 D7951CCF _www: http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~malb _jab: martinralbre...@jabber.ccc.de --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
