I'm having trouble with 4ti installation. Maybe I'm just too impatient.
Do you have an spkg for it?


On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 11:02 PM, davidp<dav...@reed.edu> wrote:
>
> Marshall and David: thanks very much for these suggestions.
>
> Dave
>
> On Jul 20, 4:59 am, David Joyner <wdjoy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 3:33 PM, davidp<dav...@reed.edu> wrote:
>>
>> > I have been working on a Sage package for doing computations involving
>> > the
>> > Abelian Sandpile Model.  In addition, this summer I am the mentor for
>> > a Google
>> > Summer of Code project which is a java application for visualizing and
>> > analyzing sandpiles.  The latest addition to the java program has been
>> > the
>> > ability to interact with Sage.  For a glance at what has been going
>> > on, I would
>> > recommend:
>>
>> >  www.reed.edu/~davidp/sand
>>
>> > especially
>>
>> >  www.reed.edu/~davidp/sand/sage/html/sage_sandpiles.html
>>
>> > and
>>
>> >  www.reed.edu/~davidp/sand/program/program.html
>>
>> > It would be great to get feedback from Sage users.  The Google Summer
>>
>> I've read the papers on RR spaces of graphs, and related papers using
>> tropical curves,
>> so am very happy to see that this is implemented. Long ago, I looked
>> at the chip-firing papers.
>> However, I had no idea that these topics were related and have
>> forgotten what I read
>> about that aspect anyway.
>>
>> You asked for comments. Looking 
>> athttp://people.reed.edu/~davidp/sand/sage/html/sage_sandpiles.html#dis...
>> andhttp://people.reed.edu/~davidp/sand/sage/html/sage_sandpiles.html#pro...
>> (in other words looking at the *output* of your code and not the code 
>> itself),
>> I have a few observations (which may or may not be useful or correct:-):
>>
>> 1) it seems to me that you have implemented rather hackish methods for
>> constructing and manipulating divisors on graphs. It would be nice if
>> they were implemented
>> in a way similar to divisors on curves (ie, as a class with methods
>> for addition, etc).
>>
>> 2) It seems you have a included some print statements for the r_of_D 
>> function:
>>
>> sage: r_of_D = S.r_of_D(D)[0]
>>     0
>>     1
>>     2
>>     sage: r_of_F = S.r_of_D(F)[0]
>>     0
>>
>> though I am not sure. I would suggest having r_of_D return r(D) by
>> default and then
>> have an option 'algorithm = "verbose"' or something if you want to
>> output the divisor F
>> as well. I suggest eliminating the print statements. Typically and assignment
>> in Python (such as r_of_D = S.r_of_D(D)[0]) has no values printed to the 
>> screen.
>>
>> 3) You seem to have a non-standard method of describing a ring in Sage:
>>
>>     sage: g = {0:{},1:{0:1,3:1,4:1},2:{0:1,3:1,5:1},
>>                3:{2:1,5:1},4:{1:1,3:1},5:{2:1,3:1}}
>>     sage: S = Sandpile(g, 0)
>>     sage: S.ring()
>>
>>     //   characteristic : 0
>>     //   number of vars : 6
>>     //        block   1 : ordering dp
>>     //                  : names    x_5 x_4 x_3 x_2 x_1 x_0
>>     //        block   2 : ordering C
>>
>> It seems to me the print method should, again, mirror that of the
>> base_ring method for an algebraic curve.
>>
>> Overall though I think this is extremely interesting code and I'm
>> looking forward
>> to playing with it a lot more! This week I'm helping with advising new 
>> freshmen
>> who will be starting classes this fall, but will try to give you more 
>> detailed
>> comments as soon as I can.
>>
>> > of Code
>> > project will end in August, so if there are any features you would
>> > like us to
>> > add to the java application, please let us know as soon as possible.
>>
>> > Thanks,
>> > Dave
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to