Minh Nguyen wrote: > Hi David, > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Minh Nguyen<nguyenmi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Dr. David >> Kirkby<david.kir...@onetel.net> wrote: >> >> <SNIP> >> >>> I forgot. Try: >>> >>> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/Solaris-fixes/mpfr/mpfr-2.4.1p0.spkg >>> >>> it should make no difference whatsoever, as the version of gcc in use >>> should be ok without the patch, but you can at least try it. >> OK. I'll now try >> >> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/Solaris-fixes/mpfr/mpfr-2.4.1p0.spkg >> >> and >> >> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/Solaris-fixes/polybori/polybori-0.5rc.p9.spkg > > A fresh build of Sage 4.1 from scratch with the following MPFR spkg: > > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mvngu/patch/mpfr-2.4.1.p0.spkg > > I used that spkg of MPFR because the one at > > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/Solaris-fixes/mpfr/mpfr-2.4.1p0.spkg > > doesn't conform to the naming convention of spkg's. The name of the > spkg should be "mpfr-2.4.1.p0.spkg", not "mpfr-2.4.1p0.spkg"; notice > the period in the former between "1" and "p0". I checked in all > changes in mpfr-2.4.1.p0.spkg in your name. All of the 148 tests > passed and mpfr-2.4.1.p0.spkg built OK. > > The problem now is that PolyBori still died with the same error > message. I took your spkg at > > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/Solaris-fixes/polybori/polybori-0.5rc.p9.spkg > > checked in all changes in your name and uploaded the updated one at > > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mvngu/patch/polybori-0.5rc.p9.spkg > > To make sure that all global environment variables that you've set > take effect, I logged out of t2, then logged in again. And started a > fresh build from there. PolyBori died with the same error message. > Maybe I didn't follow your instructions correctly. Anyway, the > compressed full log is up at > > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mvngu/patch/solaris-polybori-install.log.bz2 >
Hi, The patch I posted did allow polybori to build on my home machine, as it fixed the linker flag issues. But it did still fail to build on t2, due to the presenec of /opt/SUNWspro/bin/CC. Alexander Dreyer has sent me some further changes, which I've confirmed do allow polybori to build on t2. Should I make a .p10, and ignore the .p9, or should I make another .p9? The code will actual end code will be the same, but the patches will be different. Since Minh committed this on my behalf, but it has not received a positive review, I'm not sure what to do. Dave --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
