On Thursday 16 July 2009, William Stein wrote: > On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Martin > > Albrecht<m...@informatik.uni-bremen.de> wrote: > > Hi John, > > > >> page 29 has "PolyBoRi is not use inexplicitly": Should it be "is not > >> used explicitly" or "is used implicitly" or "is used explicitly"? > > > > I mean to say that PolyBoRi is not used 'behind the scenes' when it is > > not explicit requested. > > Why? Is it on the todo list to make it be used automatically? That > would make a lot of sense to me.
Yes, the statement is that it isn't as well integrated as it should be, i.e. I am pointing out a deficit. We should of course use for quotient rings too. Martin -- name: Martin Albrecht _pgp: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8EF0DC99 _otr: 47F43D1A 5D68C36F 468BAEBA 640E8856 D7951CCF _www: http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~malb _jab: martinralbre...@jabber.ccc.de --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
