On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 23:56:00 -0300 Golam Mortuza Hossain <gmhoss...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi, > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Burcin Erocal<bur...@erocal.org> > wrote: > >> > I plan to move the integrate() and sum() (after #3587) constructs > >> > to be symbolic functions (i.e., subclasses of SFunction from > >> > sage.symbolic.function), as opposed to regular python functions > >> > in sage.calculus.calculus. This will allow us to have real > >> > symbolic integrals and sums in Sage and define custom methods > >> > for evaluation, which can/should be more involved than just > >> > wrapping those of maxima or sympy. > > Burcin: I am wondering whether you could give an update on > sub-classing symbolic integration? I didn't have any chance to work on this. I am very busy these days with the conferences here, so I don't expect to be able to do anything about it soon either. > As you suggested, I am working with a prototype symbolic integration > class for hooking up my integration code using its _eval_ method. I > could expand the class definition but I would like to avoid effort > duplication. Your prototype class can be the real thing. :) I'd be happy to review your code when you submit it. Thanks. Burcin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
