On 5 Jul., 19:04, Bjarke Hammersholt Roune <bjarke.ro...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi gsw,
>
> Thank you for looking at the Frobby-Cython ticket. According to the
> Cython FAQ, pxd files are preferred over pxi files, unless the file
> has to contain code rather than just declarations. The file in
> question does not have any code, so you are correct that it would be
> better as a pxd file. You are also right about the spelling error. Can
> I get you to post this review athttp://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/6416
> ?
Hi Bjarke,
honestly, it would take me a month or more to review this. E.g. I
can't do anything Sage/trac related for the next 8 to 10 days, except
possibly building and uploading the Sage-4.1 OS X 10.4 binaries.
I was unsure whether you were willing to wait this long, and I left on
purpose the trac ticket in "virgin" state, so another reviewer could/
would step in.
And there are more open questions, e.g. Frobby is currently only an
"optional" spkg if I understand it correctly, so a public "vote" would
be needed, should the review finally be "technically positive", ...
On the other hand, I admit that once I got to produce a third version
of my "example C lib mini-project", this also would need someone to
review this. And I definitely do see synergies beyond "one hand washes
the other" between these two (Frobby / exClib). But alas, this will
not happen for at least a fortnight, possibly not at all this July.
Cheers,
Georg
>
> Cheers
> Bjarke
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
