On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 1:01 AM, Ondrej Certik<ond...@certik.cz> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Tim Lahey<tim.la...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Ondrej Certik<ond...@certik.cz> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Do Mac systems have /usr/include/X11? the bsd.math has it. If generaly >>> not, then I still need to tweak the configure to build without X11 at >>> all, if that is possible (maybe not). >> >> Not always. The user has to explicitly install the X11 SDK. It's >> entirely possible >> to even install X11 without having the X11 headers.
On all the macs I have access to they have that directory. These macs have the default install of XCode on them. So in my experience, unless you do something non-default, then if you can build sageyou have /usr/include/X11. When Tim says "The user has to explicitly install the X11 SDK." above, does "just installing X code and accepting the defaults" count as "explicitly installing X11 SDK"? It seems to. William --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
