>> do we need to get a secondary reviewer in that case? > > I would be fine reviewing those back, if this sounds reasonable to the > others.
The cycle of submit, reviewer resubmit, original implementor reviews resubmission has been accepted for a long time; I see no reason to change. Nick --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
