On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Nick Alexander<ncalexan...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Let's set up a regular time frame to publicly revisit the Sage >> licensing, say in yearly intervals. > > I believe that other projects have had difficulty tracking down people > who contributed code in the past when trying to deal with licensing > issues. Why is our project different? > > Nick
Either you or I misunderstood what Georg was saying, since my impression was that he was saying "I do not want to have this 'should we allow GPLv3+ code discussion' this year. Let's have it next year, and in fact make it official that we will have it every year." Of course, if we have the discussion every year, then we have to say "no" to having GPLv3+ code each year, in order to make sure that we can have the discussion again the following year. I personally do not agree with Georg, and think the we should have this discussion. -- William --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
