On Friday 22 May 2009, simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 22 Mai, 02:29, Kwankyu <ekwan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ...
>
> > This seems to me a bug. Isn't it? I am using Sage 3.4.2.
>
> Or at least: It is a very nasty inconsistency -- and note that the
> inconsistent behaviour apparently is intended.
> At least, it is doc tested:
> In the univariate case, we have the doc test
>             sage: R.<x> = QQ[]
>             sage: R(0).degree()
>             -1
> and in the multivariate case, we have the doc test
>             sage: P.<x, y> = QQ[]
>             sage: P(0).degree(x)
>             0
>             sage: P(1).degree(x)
>             0

This is just me being stupid (or at least I was stupid when I wrote this). It 
should definitely be -1. Note that I hardcoded the zero:

        if self._poly == NULL:
            return 0

I'll open a ticket and provide a fix.

> I think that it is quite usual to say that the zero polynomial has
> *no* degree, while all other constant polynomials have degree 0. And
> "no degree" is often accomplished by returning -1. This is done, e.g.,
>
> in Singular:
>   > ring R = 0, (x,y), dp;
>   > deg(0);
>
>   -1
>
> My  vote:
>  +1 for -1
>
>
> While we are at it:
>   sage: Q=singular.ring(0,'(x,y)','dp')
>   sage: Q(0)
>  -> boom
>
> I think the __call__ method of *all* rings (including those rings
> defined via some interface) should do essentially the same: Try to
> interprete the arguments as a ring element.

We just don't have any special code for Singular rings so all that is needed 
is a patch which adds it ;)

Martin

-- 
name: Martin Albrecht
_pgp: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8EF0DC99
_otr: 47F43D1A 5D68C36F 468BAEBA 640E8856 D7951CCF
_www: http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~malb
_jab: martinralbre...@jabber.ccc.de


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to