On May 13, 2009, at 11:23 AM, Carl Witty wrote: > On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Robert Bradshaw > <rober...@math.washington.edu> wrote: >> >> I recently noticed that complex interval fields have a very different >> notion of equality than real interval fields. For RIF, a != b if a is >> *definitely* not equal to b, but CIF just compares endpoints. I think >> we should change CIF's behavior to be more like RIF, does anyone have >> any objections? > > No objection from me. (Sorry, this is surely my fault; I don't > remember what I was thinking at the time.)
Excellent. Yours was the main opinion I was looking for. I'll be fixing this as part of the new symbolics. - Robert --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
