On May 5, 4:40 am, simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On May 5, 1:22 pm, mabshoff <mabsh...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > Yes, everything but src should be under revision control.
>
> Everything *but* src? I thought src would be the most interesting part
> of an spkg...
The whoke point is that src contains clean upstream sources you can
download from wherever you document in SPKG.txt.
> And, Alex, thank you for the pointer to the Wiki page! I am one of
> those old fashioned people who think that looking into a manual
> replaces a Wiki... :)
> Actually I was not aware that SPKG_Audit exists.
Well, it isn't the best name IMHO and its content is supposed to go
into the manual. Then we should get rid of the content of that wiki
page and refer to the proper manual page instead.
> Cheers,
> Simon
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
