mabshoff wrote:
>
>
> On May 4, 9:33 am, mabshoff <mabsh...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> On May 4, 9:07 am, Jaap Spies <j.sp...@hccnet.nl> wrote:
>
> <SNIP>
>
>> Arrg, this is cause by Integer(2**40) on 32 bit systems being "0" in
>> Cython. I didn't use any long representation of 2^40 to avoid running
>> into 32 vs. 64 bit issues. Oh well, please open a ticket, I guess
>> there will be another "final" 3.4.2 tarball :(
>
> This is now #5981 with a proto patch attached. With it prime_pi.pyx
> passes doctests on a 32 bit box for me.
>
I'm ready to give this patch a positive review :)
./sage -t "devel/sage/sage/functions/prime_pi.pyx"
sage -t "devel/sage/sage/functions/prime_pi.pyx"
[48.1 s]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
All tests passed!
Total time for all tests: 48.1 seconds
Jaap
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
