On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 2:02 PM, mabshoff <mabsh...@googlemail.com> wrote: > I have been looking at http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html, but > there are various questions and answers about "additional > permissions" , but nothing in the direction of "additional > restrictions" that seem to match. From an amateur standpoint this > export restriction seems like an additional restriction that would > make the code GPL incompatible. Maybe someone ought to contact FSF's > licensing people?
>From the thread that Tim posted (http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-le...@lists.debian.org/msg16593.html): "Dave Turner, the FSF's ``GPL Compliance Engineer'' suggests including the DOE text in the SAME FILE as the GPL will be sufficient to honour the DOE's requirement while also not modifying the GPL. The text should note that it is not part of the licence." --Mike --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
