Yeah, I should have mentioned that my point was that maybe h%3 should raise an error over QQ.
On Apr 24, 11:00 am, Craig Citro <craigci...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Worse still: > > > sage: x = polygen(QQ) > > sage: h = 4*x > > sage: h%3 > > 0 > > Over QQ[x], isn't 4*x = 3 * (4/3*x) ? Over ZZ, it's fine: > > sage: x = polygen(ZZ) > sage: h = 4*x > sage: h%3 > x > > -cc --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
