>>> >>> 1. sage -coverage asks for a doctest of the form s == loads(dumps(s)). >>> As far as I can tell however, it is happy if there is one such test >>> in a file, even if the file happens to define 20 different classes. I >>> would assume that we want a doctest of this form for each class >>> definition, is that right? If so, can/should sage -coverage be >>> changed to indicate this? >> >> Yes, I think that is a bug and not having pickles of all classes will >> cause trouble down the road. Please open a ticket. > > It definitely would be nice if this functionality were added.
This is now http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5819 >>> 3. as I mentioned, I looked in rings/morphism.pyx for inspiration; >>> this helped, but not enough so I tried >>> sage: f = ZZ.hom(QQ) >>> sage: g = loads(dumps(f)) >>> sage: f == g >>> False >>> >>> Shouldn't this return True? > > Yes > >>> Shouldn't a test like this be somewhere >>> in rings/morphism.pyx? > > Yes. > This is now http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5820 -- Alex Ghitza -- Lecturer in Mathematics -- The University of Melbourne -- Australia -- http://www.ms.unimelb.edu.au/~aghitza/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
