On Apr 9, 2:11 pm, mabshoff <mabsh...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 9, 2:03 pm, Peter Jeremy <peterjer...@optushome.com.au> wrote:
<SNIP>
> The primality test for pari is known to be lead to false results up to
> 10^14 or so (FLINT's is up to 10^16 IIRC what Bill told me a couple
> days ago).
Opps, I don't know what I was thinking, but the above makes no sense
as written: What I wanted to write was that pari's probabilistic
primality test is known to be correct for up to some bound around
10^14. Sorry for the double post.
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
