John, I think we should keep this discussion on-list so I am cc-ing sage-devel.
In answer to your question, yes, I have been using Sage on that machine for ages and try to test builds on it whenever I can since it often shows up some strange things. With 3.4.rc1 it works fince apart from that one doctest failure, which I guessed was caused by the machine being heavily loaded at the time. for your info, it is j...@host-57-89%cat /proc/version Linux version 2.6.18.8-0.3-default (ge...@buildhost) (gcc version 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (SUSE Linux)) #1 SMP Tue Apr 17 08:42:35 UTC 2007 John 2009/3/11 John Young <j.e.yo...@larc.nasa.gov>: > John, > > I saw your post of 09 March 2009 regarding building sage > 3.4.rc1. Were you ever able to get a successful build of sage > under 64-bit SuSE? > > JY > ------------------------------------------------------------ > John E. Young NASA LaRC B1148/R226 > Analytical Services and Materials, Inc. (757) 864-8659 > 'All ideas and opinions expressed in this communication are > those of the author alone and do not necessarily reflect the > ideas and opinions of anyone else.' > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
