On Mar 9, 2009, at 8:49 AM, Jason Grout wrote: > Harald Schilly wrote: >> On Mar 9, 11:27 am, Tim Lahey <tim.la...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> ... but I think the canvas back end has a >>> decent chance of being funded. >> >> Yes, but first of all, this week until the 13th we need to have a >> proposal for Sage as a mentor group. Therefore it should focus on >> such >> tasks that have no maths background and average IT students are able >> to solve them. Later on, iff Sage is selected as a mentor group and >> students submit proposals for different tasks (integration, etc.) it >> could be discussed. If Sage is not selected, nothing will happen :\ >> So, I hope some mentors pop up and we manage to write a decent >> proposal in the next few days! There is enough non-maths stuff that >> needs to be done.
+1 to all the suggestions to improving plotting. I think that's an area that could be tackled by someone with less math background, and also produce tangible results. > Is Cython going to be entering again this year? What about scipy/ > numpy, > sympy, ginac, or other projects that Sage relies on? I can see > enhancing pynac as falling under the ginac project, for example. It doesn't look like we'll have enough potential mentors to be a full organization, but we'll probably try and do a project or two under the Python umbrella (or perhaps even scipy/numpy). - Robert --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
