On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 09:32:05PM +0100, Nicolas Thiéry wrote: > > sage: SetPartitions > > SetPartitions SetPartitionsIk SetPartitionsRk > > SetPartitionsAk SetPartitionsPRk SetPartitionsSk > > SetPartitionsBk SetPartitionsPk SetPartitionsTk > > Yes, as you suggest below, this indeed definitely should be reduced to > something like: > SetPartitions(..., type=["A",3])
Now: http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/5458 > > sage: Ja > > JackPolynomialsJ JackPolynomialsP JackPolynomialsQ JackPolynomialsQp > This one (together with SFA*, Macdonald*, kSchur*, ...) will be fixed > as soon as someone steps up to reorganize the symmetric functions > stuff as it is in MuPAD-Combinat. There, we had a single entry point: > > S = SymmetricFunctions(field) > S.schur > S.jack(t).P > S.macdonald(t,q).Q > S.kSchur(3) > > Volunteers? Now: http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/5457 Cheers, Nicolas -- Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil" <nthi...@users.sf.net> http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
