mark mcclure wrote: > On Feb 26, 11:35 pm, Jason Grout <jason-s...@creativetrax.com> wrote: >> What is the Networkx timing? That seems like the best. > > That's just straight up NetworkX run independently of Sage. > Of course, the code is almost identical.
So it seems that your timings indicate that Networkx's isomorphism checker is faster than the Sage one, even if we convert to c_graphs. Is that right? That's embarrassing; I thought we had the "fastest isomorphism checker in the west". Jason --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
