On Feb 26, 2009, at 11:06 PM, William Stein wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 1:48 AM, Alex Ghitza <aghi...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Hi William, >> >> A few comments: >> >> page 36, first line: "An nonsingular" should be "A nonsingular" >> page 36, Faltings' theorem: "finitely rational points" should be >> "finitely >> many rational points" >> page 36, BSD: again, "finitely" should be "finitely many" >> > > Thanks. > >> page 41: seeing P, 2*P, and 3*P does not really convince me that P >> has >> infinite order; seeing P.height() not equal to zero does; or if I >> don't know >> anything about elliptic curves, I would still be happy to see >> P.order() >> return +Infinity >> > > OK, I did that. I guess the typical viewer of my slides won't know > Nagell-Lutz that if a point has a denominator, then it is of infinite > order...
I guess you were thinking about your lesson from yesterday :). I just briefly glanced at the PDF, and nothing glaring stood out to me. - Robert --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
