> So I'd like to know whether the focus should be on trying to > get Macaulay2 integrated in Sage, or to develop this stuff natively in Sage > using Macaulay2 as a cheat sheet (= porting functionality to Sage bit by > bit, I guess is what I'm saying).
Hi, due to the issues pointed out by Michael I guess porting stuff to Sage should be the preferred option for now. I guess a start would be to figure out what user's really really like about M2 and then see what we can do about that. However, that strategy might not be well received by the audience of SD14? Cheers, Martin -- name: Martin Albrecht _pgp: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8EF0DC99 _otr: 47F43D1A 5D68C36F 468BAEBA 640E8856 D7951CCF _www: http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~malb _jab: martinralbre...@jabber.ccc.de --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
