There is quite a bit of discussion going on at ticket 
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4890 about nauty's interactive 
installation that demands that a user agree to a license.  I originally 
made that spkg and the result of the discussion at that time was that an 
interactive license was needed.  There is strong disapproval of having 
an interactive license now.  The end of the discussion on the ticket 
points to having a thread on sage-devel to address the question.  For 
your convenience, here is the last comment:


"> I would still not call this interactive error message "stupid" since
 > it was done deliberately.

"I think interactive license agreements are annoying. They are all done 
deliberately.

"> Nauty is not only non-free, but its license prohibits its use for
 > works involving primarily military applications, so this is not about
 > non-GPL vs. GPL.

"Nauty is free as in beer, but the free license it is under is not 
"libre" i.e., not OSI approved and not GPL-compatible. Nauty's license 
is: "Permission is hereby given for use and/or distribution with the 
exception of sale for profit or application with nontrivial military 
significance." There are essentially no other restrictions.

"Since we have a fundamental disagreement here, this will need to be 
discussed on sage-devel and possibly voted on."




Note that in this case, apparently nauty is included in an (optional?) 
package we install with gap, so at least there is inconsistency here.

Does someone (William?, mabshoff?) want to explicitly state the proposal 
we are voting on?


Personally, I don't care either way.  I guess I've been weaned off of 
nauty for a while now, thanks to Robert's good code :).

Thanks,

Jason


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to