I agree with Mike and William. john perry
On Jan 27, 12:52 am, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Mike Hansen <mhan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Jason Grout > > <jason-s...@creativetrax.com> wrote: > >> How about this slight change in syntax: > > >> @interact(update=False) > >> def _(... > > > If you wanted to do this, and still support the regular @interact > > (with no parens) syntax, then you'll need to make a pretty > > awkward/convoluted construction in order support both. > > > As the functions parameters already affect how interact works, I don't > > think an interact_update=False would be that surprising. > > +1 to this; Mike speaks from having a very strong sense for how decorators > work in Python. > > Personally, I would prefer update=False. It would be easier to > remember than interact_update, which is rather long. > > By the way, it's about time figure out how to specify more precisely > layout information for controls. Any proposals for the syntax for > this. I've cc'd Igor Tolkov, who once suggested something to me last > summer (he did a Google-funded project on @interact last summer -- > thanks Google!). > > William --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
