> I can time Magma for you on a 2.4GHz Opteron. I don't have access on a
> Core 2, but other people on this list do.
>

It would indeed be interesting to have timings of giac (with the icas
executable, available on my homepage at sage) and magma on the same
PC.

> That's interesting. The Opteron timings are way slower than the Core 2
> timings. Do you know why that might be?
>

No. This is perhaps a natural evolution between Opteron and Xeon + the
clock speed.

> I am sure FLINT is much faster than those timings. It will be
> interesting to get timings for Magma....
>

I expect that FLINT should be faster especially for large degree and
non modular gcd (where some improvements should be made inside giac).

> Sorry, of course I meant to ask whether the check you are doing takes
> longer than the actual GCD itself.

For 2 variables, clearly yes. But for 3 or more variables, it is more
difficult to say since computing the gcd requires recursive call and I
would also have to mesure the time used for checking in the recursive
calls.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to